Several people have asked me this morning my thoughts on Harper Lee’s new book, Go Set a Watchman. I must admit to feeling somewhat negative about the book.
There’s so much controversy surrounding the release of it. In one article I read about it, it mentioned that Lee actually wrote and submitted this book prior to writing and releasing TKAM. GSAW was rejected. I’m sorry I can’t site that source. Didn’t occur to me I might need it later. I’ve no clue if that’s accurate or not. But if that is truly the case, it might be why she didn’t want it published. Now she has no say in the matter.
I’m very suspicious of the secrecy that surrounds her. Supposedly they are not even letting her see the friend that has been by her side for years. It seems a little off to me. And I read yesterday there was a third book they had found — don’t know about what — that they are planning to release. But what bothers me the most are the many inconsistencies in the book.
Many of the people who got to read the galley proof of this new book didn’t like it because it ends up making Atticus seems like a racist. I think before I buy it I will read other reviews. It feels kind of like having older relatives. Sometimes you just want to remember them the way they were… Know what I mean? In her 50th anniversary (of the book) interview Lee said she only ever had one thing she wanted to say and she said it in TKAM. So I have to wonder about these other two books. I’m not in favor of them being published.
Here is a recent NPR article about the book: Harper Lee’s ‘Watchman’ Is A Mess That Makes Us Reconsider A Masterpiece. And yet there was an interesting article about it in the New York Times yesterday. If you are interested in the controversy surrounding the book, these are two good articles to read.
So what are YOUR thoughts about it?
I’m ambivalent. I think it’s ok to publish it as a draft, but not as a fully finished novel.
I am sure we’ve lost a lot because texts, letters and writing are sometimes surpressed for the most worthy of reasons. For example, I’d love the chance to read the book Emily Bronte was writing when she died.
I sense some commercial exploitation and do not feel comfortable with that, but at least it’s fairly transparent in this case. Providing we don’t judge the writer too harshly, all will be well – ie don’t allow the one to detract from the other.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Absolutely agree. So what happened to Bronte’s novel?
LikeLike
It has never been found. We’ll probably never know if it had progressed much beyond the planning stage – it’s a bit of a literary mystery.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am reading it now but I am not comfortable withe the decision to publish. I suspect she was coerced.
LikeLiked by 1 person
If they even gave her a choice. I know her lawyer is questioning the whole thing. I suppose all this hype could be just a way to get attention? Please do stop back and let us know what you thought of it. I’d be really interested to hear.
LikeLike
The Alabama Literary people are all abuzz about it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Are you a TKAM fan? I know you don’t read much since college. You’d probably find that article from the NYT interesting. It’s kind of from a lawyer’s pov.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve never read it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
No kiddin’? Well, you’re missing a gem there, boyo. Just watch the movie since you’re not into books. Or have you seen it?
LikeLiked by 1 person
No. Maybe I will look on netflix
LikeLike
I only know George Stephanopoulos said it was “riveting”. I heard the other remarks also, but I trust George. Because I love him. In a non-creepy way. The end.
LikeLiked by 1 person
LMBO! I think you are George should just make it official and call it a “thing!” Just don’t let him do your thinkin’ for you! He has a way of turning your head! 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person